Nifty Midcap 150 Quality 50 Index Funds & ETFs — Key Metrics
Compare all passive mutual funds and ETFs tracking Nifty Midcap 150 Quality 50 by live tracking error, direct expense ratio (TER), and AUM.
Nifty Midcap 150 Quality 50 Category Summary & Statistics
Active Index Funds / ETFs
4
Tracking Nifty Midcap 150 Quality 50
Category Avg. Expense Ratio
0.47%
Avg Direct Plan TER
Lowest Expense Ratio
0.29%
UTI Nifty Midcap 150 ETF
Highest AUM
₹398 Cr
DSP Nifty Midcap 150 Quality 50 Index Fund
Lowest Tracking Error
0.0500%
UTI Nifty Midcap 150 ETF
Nifty Midcap 150 Quality 50 — Key Insights & Category Highlights
- Lowest Tracking Error: UTI Nifty Midcap 150 ETF leads with 0.05% annualized tracking error (category average is 0.08%).
- Lowest Cost Leader: UTI Nifty Midcap 150 ETF charges the lowest direct expense ratio (TER) at 0.29% vs category average of 0.47%.
- Category Scale: ₹542 Cr combined AUM across 4 schemes (2 Index Funds, 2 ETFs), led by DSP Nifty Midcap 150 Quality 50 Index Fund (₹398 Cr).
- Expense Ratio Spread: Direct TER ranges from 0.29% to 0.69% (a 0.40% annual fee gap that compounds into tracking difference).
- Tracking Error Variance: Replication error varies from 0.05% to 0.10%. Compare multi-year consistency on the historical chart below.
- Liquidity Watchout: 2 schemes tracking Nifty Midcap 150 Quality 50 report AUM under ₹50 Cr; ETF buyers should verify exchange order-book depth and impact cost.
Nifty Midcap 150 Quality 50 Historical Tracking Error & TER Comparison Chart
Fetching historical time-series for Nifty Midcap 150 Quality 50...
Nifty Midcap 150 Quality 50 — Fund Directory & Metrics Breakdown
UTI Nifty Midcap 150 ETF | ETF | Very High | 0.0500% | 0.29% | ₹16.80 Cr | 2026-09-30 |
DSP Nifty Midcap 150 Quality 50 ETF | ETF | Very High | 0.0800% | 0.42% | ₹93.00 Cr | 2026-09-30 |
UTI Nifty Midcap 150 Quality 50 Index Fund | Mutual Fund | Very High | 0.0800% | 0.69% | ₹34.63 Cr | 2026-09-30 |
DSP Nifty Midcap 150 Quality 50 Index Fund | Mutual Fund | Very High | 0.1000% | 0.47% | ₹398.00 Cr | 2026-09-30 |
Peer Equity Benchmark Indices
All Passive FundsEquity BenchmarksNifty Midcap 150 Quality 50
Evaluation Methodology: Tracking Error, Expense Ratio & Debt Metrics
Calculated as the annualized standard deviation of daily excess returns: TE = √250 × σ(R_fund − R_index). Lower tracking error signifies tighter replication discipline and minimal cash drag.
A lower TER directly mitigates return drag over compounding horizons. Higher AUM funds generally feature tighter bid-ask spreads on exchange order books and robust secondary market liquidity.
Yield to Maturity (YTM) indicates gross portfolio yield if securities are held to maturity. Modified duration gauges sensitivity to RBI repo rate changes—shorter duration reduces capital volatility.
Data Sourcing & Update Schedule: All scheme metrics are sourced directly from AMC Factsheets and updated once a month based on the availability and release schedules of factsheets from various AMCs.
Missing Data: Metrics where — is displayed indicate data missing in the AMC's factsheet or that the factsheet itself has not yet been published for the recent month.